Thursday, July 30, 2009

Whether You're Straight or Gay


Since the beginning of 2009, two states have passed bills or upheld court rulings legalizing gay marriage. In the United States, there are currently six states that have passed legislation allowing some form of
same-sex marriage. Twenty-eight states have passed laws specifically prohibiting gay marriage. On the other hand, in the European Union there are fourteen countries that allow some type of civil union or same-sex marriage out of the twenty-seven total. While equal rights activists support the growing trend of legalization, there are still many conservative or religious groups that adamantly oppose the idea of same-sex marriage. Their arguments stem from the idea that marriage is defined as between one man and one woman. However, does the government really have the right to decide what marriage is defined as (in regards to human race, at least)?

Gay equal rights took center stage in 2004 when President Bush announced his support for a
constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man in a woman. Gay rights was not a major issue in the 2008 presidential election, taking the back seat to more pressing issues such as the economy and the handling of the Iraq war. However, moving into 2009, gay rights once again rose to the surface in April when Iowa upheld citizens’ right to same-sex marriage. A state court rejected the state law that banned gay marriage to begin with. New Hampshire recently followed suit by passing a same-sex marriage bill in June. Most recently, the state of Massachusetts sued the U.S. government stating that DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act), passed in 1996, violated equal rights. The state of Massachusetts claims that the act prevents the state from “[defining] and [regulating] marriage as it sees fit.” The state also declares that this act requires the state to violate citizen’s rights by treating homosexual couples differently than heterosexual couples in matters such as Medicaid.

Overall, the allocations against gay marriage are numbered. However, the truth of the matter is that by preventing gay marriage, the government is infringing on the rights of citizens. Just as stated in the law suit against the U.S. government by Massachusetts, Congress “overstepped its authority” creating an “overreaching and discriminatory federal law.” Although the act was passed thirteen years ago, there is a reason that now it is being challenged. As the rest of the world changes to give rights to homosexuals, the U.S. will eventually have to change with it. Whether conservatives and religious groups like it or not, it is the right of an individual to be able to share their legal rights with whomever they choose. Same-sex couples need to be able to have joint taxes, property, and the like. Without these rights, heterosexual couples are treated better than homosexual couples from a government standpoint. As in the past, the government must change its laws to allow for equality amongst all its citizens, straight or gay.

2 comments:

  1. I disagree with the opinion of the author of "Whether You're Straight or Gay" on the issue of same-sex marriage. If the government decides to grant marriage rights to gay couples then where will they stop after that? I'm sure polygamists also want the same marital rights one man and one woman enjoy, so will polygamy be legalized next? What about lowering the legal age of marriage eligibility, maybe teenagers who have run away from home with their significant other desire tax breaks as well. Then, once teenagers can get married, maybe pedophilia will be legalized also. Do any of those scenarios sound ridiculous to you? The issue of legalizing gay marriage would have sounded ridiculous to Americans 50 years ago, so don't be surprised if these issues are brought up in the future, and their supporters point to gay-marriage rights as the starting point for their movements.

    However, I do agree with the author's opinion that the government does not have the right to decide the definition of marriage. I think it's the right of the church to define marriage since their definition of marriage is the one that Americans have used since the creation of our nation. The United States government, according to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, has no right to prohibit the establishments of the church (1). If ministers are forced by law to perform gay marriages then the national government has blatantly disregarded the First Amendment. If the U.S. Government legalizes same-sex marriage then they actually are creating and enforcing their own definition of marriage, rather than continuing to accept the one established by the church.

    According to this article posted on the home page of the University of Texas website back in June, more than half of the respondents to a same-sex-couple study "Deemed commitment ceremonies as unimportant and pointless" (2). To me, this study says that the majority of gay couples don't care about the institution of marriage, just the benefits it brings. If this is the case then why should the church's almost 2,000 year old definition of marriage be forced by the government to accommodate the recent (within the last 20 years) wishes of the homosexual community?

    As for the European Union's view on same-sex marriage, it does not matter. The United States of America is its own sovereign nation and takes no orders from any country, except from its own citizens. According to this Gallup poll, a majority of Americans still oppose gay marriage, which is why it is still illegal in most states (3).

    On a personal note, having talked so much about same-sex marriage, I feel I should address the many misconceptions about "homophobes." I don't think homosexuals should have the right to marry, but I do believe they are human beings whose lives are just as valuable as any heterosexual person's life. The church stands by the guidelines found in the Christian Bible and is only exercising its right to free speech by saying homosexual behavior is wrong. No one is being persecuted or killed for their beliefs, and the Bible does not advocate any sort of treatment of this kind towards homosexuals. All the church asks for is behavioral change, and if an individual denies that request then it's between that person and God, and the church should not target that individual for harassment for his/her refusal to make a lifestyle change.

    Sorry, I don't know how to make text links in a comment, so I resorted to posting the URL's below.

    (1) http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmenti

    (2) http://www.utexas.edu/news/2009/06/01/gay_couples_marriage/

    (3) http://www.gallup.com/poll/118378/majority-americans-contine-oppose-gay-marriage.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Leviticus 20:13
    "And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
    Does that sound violent to you? Cause that sure sounds violent to me, and seeing as this verse is directly out of the bible(American Standerd Version) I do not believe it is a stretch to infer that the bible also advocates this treatment of homosexuals.

    ReplyDelete